Investment is one of the most important choices that you can make. Americans tend not to save enough for retirement, and making good investment choices can solve that problem. Investment is divided into two main approaches: active and passive.
They have different costs and benefits that can have large implications for the outcome of your choices. In this post, we will describe active versus passive investing and when you might want one over the other.
What is Active Investing?
Under active investment, the manager of the fund or portfolio where you have placed your money will make frequent moves to earn as high a return as they can. This might entail things like buying an asset at the beginning of the day to sell it near the end at a higher price.
That is an extreme example, but the fundamental idea is that the manager attempts to beat the market. That means earning a higher rate of return than a particular index, such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average or the S&P 500.
If it works out, then the fund can do well. However, it is difficult to maintain higher rates of return, especially over a long time. Moreover, more trading means more fees and higher management costs.
What is Passive Investing?
In contrast to active investing, the passive style of management emphasizes matching the market and minimizing costs. A passive manager chooses a particular benchmark and then takes steps to mimic its movements.
They can do this by purchasing the assets that make up the benchmark index. Or perhaps it could work by buying similar ones that act similarly. Passive management is ideal for a long-term strategy. This is because in the long run, historically the market as a whole goes up even if there are temporary dips. Moreover, the fees and costs of a passive fund are much lower.
How To Implement Passive or Active Investing
Usually, individuals cannot purchase assets like stocks on their own. It takes a licensed broker to do that. That is why nearly everyone works with a wealth manager of some kind. This might be a mutual fund manager that you contact directly. It might also be someone who works on your behalf as part of a large bank.
In that case, you might never meet the manager. In either case, you have the choice of selecting a manager who works in active versus passive investing in accordance with your goals.
You can choose to invest with more than one manager or fund at a time. That will mean that you can place some of your money with an active investor. At the same time time, another sum could be placed with a passive one. It’s a way to manage the level of risk and take more control over your costs.
This is also a means of diversifying your holdings. By spreading them among separate strategies, you reduce your exposure in case one of them doesn’t perform as well as you wanted.
Even when you are deciding between different managers and funds of the same type, you can compare them across other aspects. For example, see which of your options has the lowest expense ratio.
This is a measure of the costs you need to pay. You can also look to see if any of the funds invests in a company or other entity to which you have a moral objection.
Active Versus Passive Investing: When to Use One or Both Strategies
The right strategy to use is never a simple decision. Often, there is no obvious best answer. A passive investing strategy might leave you with more money after a while because of the lower fees and consistency. An active one may provide better returns as a result of good trading choices.
For some cases, the choice is fairly clear. For example, basic retirement savings like the IRA or the 401k offer many different options. Still, there are not few those who consider that a passive strategy is normally best.
That is because you know for a fact that you won’t be withdrawing any money from the account for a long time. If you do, you will face fees and taxes. As a retirement strategy, you want something that will deliver you consistent performance with low risk. That, along with the lower expenses, fits the profile of passive investment.
An active strategy may be more useful when you have hit the contribution limits for your retirement accounts and need to look elsewhere. That gives you a channel to invest with a little more risk and higher potential reward. The choice you make when you choose an active approach is that the strategy that you expect your strategy to beat the market.
If you have a lot of confidence in a strategy that you have developed or that a manager has found, then an active approach is the only way to try it out.
Perhaps it is better to think of active versus passive investing as supporting each other rather than competing. A passive fund can give you a dependable and low-cost bedrock that will give you the best shot at a good retirement.
Then if you have more to save, you can start working with an active strategy that you believe may provide a better return. As long as you feel confident that the higher return will outweigh the greater costs, it might eventually lead to better outcomes.
Before you make any significant change to your financial plans, you should consult a planner. If unable to do so, seek the advice of any professional who can give you specific details for your situation. Don’t wait, because the earlier you start investing, the sooner you can start growing your savings.
Do you have a preference for active or passive investing? Let us know in the comments below.
Image Source: Pexels